I do agree, TyrS, that you have hit upon something that this article lacks and that is the male-as-fistee perspective. The image of the female at the top of the article is very nice but is not complete because it does not depict anal fisting. How old were you the first time you did it? No consensus, and irrelevant: There's been little discussion of what is allegedly wrong with the female drawing, though no one has contradicted the assertions that it is anatomically flawed. What we have now isn't good, but it's the best we can do for now. I found any kind of penetration incredibly painful, as my vagina would tense up involuntarily. But sticking your hand up someone's ass is not complicated — one hole, one chute, in, out, shake it all about, the rectum doesn't divert, lead off elsewhere, it's past the sphincter and turn left at the kidneys then straight up the colon until you reach the chocolate factory.
It would certainly lend greater breadth to the article. The only reason you are giving for its removal all 100% your opinion. There is nothing preventing you, or anyone, from producing your own illustration and releasing it to the community. There is no context for the picture. How does it not accurately describe fisting? I think it would hurt if you weren't tuned into each other. We are not censored, but the prime policy here is.
So without further adieu, let's dive right in pun totally intended with some tips on how to fist your partner without her feeling like you're punching her in the vagina. When photos are uploaded they're deleted. The argument has been stated numerous times that there is no better image available. So, perhaps another argument for replacement, but not for bare removal. Just beacause I can go online and see 'genuine photos' of men with supposedly 15 inch penises, it doesn't make it real. There may be a tiny number of men who actually fit these dimensions, but in reality, photoshopping of the images of normal porn actors is rampant, to the point where there would be no reliable case for using porn sites to cite a wikipedia article on penis size.
. You don't need this image for explaining what fisting is. This is the fisting article and a reader should expect an image on the topic. Non-notable people cannot really be people noted to have engaged in fisting, especially if their mention is unsourced. Cartoon pictures do not make it any less inappropriate. Woman A: We needed a lot of time and used water-based lube and latex gloves. The Ultimate Guide to Anal Sex for Women, Taormino, T.
Oil-based lubes do have the disadvantage of breaking down latex, but latex gloves tend to be thicker than condoms and should hold up all right. Articles on breast cancer contain images of breasts. Age discrimination is no less prevalent than sexuality discrimination. If you provide a less disgusting fisting picture I would be happy with it. I loved that enormous pierced cunt, a work of art.
If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit for additional information. Also, it sounds like you dislike looking at photographs of gay men doing butt stuff. That the image is not a clear depiction of fisting and the focus of the image is on his erected penis and scrotum is both true and false. You can't seriously expect us to follow random, dumb, or contradictory laws from two hundred countries. An argument for replacing the image does not equate to an argument for removing and not replacing it, especially when the expressed reasons to do so when any were given are contradicted by policy. Picture removed from article: do not repost please Original photo of the fresco: Hi-Res Please see original image. The physical act of fisting alone isn't what gives fisting notability, imo, rather the prevalence between f-m, m-m, f-m, and even the thought that gender reassigned male to female persons may practice either form.
O-Pearl we should keep, since she is sourced, had an article, and might again when I have a chance to do the research. And your comment In the meantime why don't you ask someone to do some fisting on yourself and take a much better picture and post it so we get rid of this horrendous one? When I created the section back in 2009 I sourced every performer in one way or another, but now we have all these who haven't been. I am frustrated by your stubbornness; you seem to want the image included simply from its vulgarity, ignoring or hopefully not understanding the points that have been made. It is not clear in the sense that the bottom of the image is cropped to the point where it is not provable that the inserted object is someone's gloved hand. What kind of sick deviant would let someone do this? Even if the colon and intestines are flexible, human arms only bend in two places excluding the shoulder.
The consensus of the few involved editors is to remove the picture. If a corruption is needed to illustrate it then obviously it cannot be attributed to the original source. Again, the key is to go slow and talk about how things feel. Common sense supports: Obviously true, though mitigated by concerns that the image isn't clear enough and should be replaced. Wikipedia is not a How-to manual it is an Encyclopedia. It is suitable as an illustration of anal fisting, the woman is vaginal fisting.